Which manufacturing process is better—adding layers or removing material? Additive and subtractive manufacturing differ in significant ways. Understanding these differences is key to choosing the right method.
In this post, we’ll explore their advantages, limitations, and real-world applications. You’ll learn how to decide between these two approaches for your next project.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a process that creates objects by adding material layer by layer, typically based on a 3D model. Unlike traditional methods, which remove material, AM constructs parts from scratch, allowing for intricate designs and material efficiency.
The concept of AM dates back to the 1980s, when 3D printing technologies were first introduced. Early innovations were aimed at rapid prototyping, providing faster, more affordable ways to create product prototypes. Since then, AM has evolved into a wide array of industrial applications, including aerospace, automotive, and medical fields.
Additive manufacturing begins with a CAD model. The model is sliced into thin layers using software. The AM machine then adds material, layer by layer, until the final object is formed. Materials used range from plastics to metals. Depending on the process, it may require post-processing, such as cleaning or curing, to complete the part.
Several techniques fall under the umbrella of AM, each offering unique advantages:
3D printing is the most recognized AM method. It builds objects by layering materials like plastic or metal. Ideal for custom parts and prototypes, it's widely accessible and cost-effective for smaller applications.
SLS uses a laser to sinter powdered material, typically plastic or metal, into solid parts. It’s known for creating durable, functional prototypes with complex geometries.
FDM works by extruding thermoplastic filaments through a heated nozzle. It’s commonly used for prototyping and producing low-cost plastic parts.
SLA uses ultraviolet light to cure liquid resin layer by layer, creating highly accurate parts with smooth finishes. It’s suited for intricate designs and fine details.
DMLS builds metal parts by sintering fine metal powders using a laser. This technique is ideal for producing complex, strong metal components for industries like aerospace.
In addition to the commonly known methods, several other advanced techniques are available:
Binder Jetting: A bonding agent selectively deposits between powder layers, creating complex structures.
Directed Energy Deposition (DED): This technique uses focused thermal energy to fuse materials as they are deposited, often used for repairing or adding features to existing parts.
Material Extrusion: Material is selectively extruded through a nozzle to build layers, commonly used with thermoplastics.
Material Jetting: Droplets of material are deposited layer by layer to create precise parts, often using photopolymers.
Sheet Lamination: Sheets of material are bonded layer by layer, suitable for metals and composites.
Vat Photopolymerization: Liquid resin is selectively cured by light to form solid parts, with applications in both prototyping and production.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers numerous benefits across industries. These advantages make it a game-changer in modern production.
AM uses only the material needed for the final product. This approach significantly reduces waste compared to traditional methods.
AM excels in creating complex shapes. It can produce parts impossible to make with conventional techniques.
Internal channels
Lattice structures
Organic forms
Rapid prototyping becomes reality with AM. It allows quick iterations and faster product development cycles.
Traditional Prototyping | AM Prototyping |
---|---|
Weeks to months | Hours to days |
Multiple steps | Single process |
High tooling costs | No tooling |
AM shines in producing small quantities. It eliminates the need for expensive molds or tooling.
The reduction in waste translates to improved sustainability. AM conserves resources and energy.
Less raw material consumption
Reduced transportation needs
Lower energy usage in production
AM enables tailoring products to individual needs. This opens new possibilities in various fields:
Medical implants
Custom jewelry
Personalized consumer goods
While Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers many benefits, it also has limitations. Understanding these drawbacks is crucial for its effective application.
AM uses fewer materials than subtractive methods. This restriction can limit its use in certain industries.
Common AM materials:
Thermoplastics
Some metals
Certain ceramics
AM excels in small batches but lags in mass production. Traditional methods often outpace it for large volumes.
Production Volume | AM Speed | Traditional Speed |
---|---|---|
Small (1-100) | Fast | Slow |
Medium (100-1000) | Moderate | Fast |
Large (1000+) | Slow | Very Fast |
For mass production, AM can be more expensive. The cost per unit doesn't decrease significantly with volume.
AM parts may have lower precision than machined ones. Their surface finish often requires improvement.
Achieving tight tolerances is difficult with AM. This can be problematic for parts needing precise fits.
Most AM parts need additional work after printing. This adds time and cost to the production process.
Common post-processing steps:
Removing support structures
Surface smoothing
Heat treatment
Painting or coating
Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) creates objects by removing material from a solid block. It's a traditional method used in various industries.
SM dates back to ancient times. Early examples include stone carving and woodworking. Modern SM evolved with the Industrial Revolution, leading to precise machine tools.
SM starts with a larger piece of material. Machines or tools then cut away excess material to create the desired shape.
Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines use programmed instructions to remove material.
Milling: Cuts material using rotating tools
Turning: Shapes cylindrical parts by rotating the workpiece
Drilling: Creates holes in the material
This technique uses a high-powered laser to cut materials. It's precise and works on various materials.
Waterjet cutting uses high-pressure water, often mixed with abrasive particles, to cut materials.
Plasma cutting melts material using an electrically conductive gas. It's effective for cutting metal.
EDM uses electrical discharges to remove material. It's ideal for hard metals and complex shapes.
Grinding: Uses abrasive wheels for fine surface finishes
Reaming: Enlarges and finishes holes
Boring: Enlarges holes with single-point cutting tools
EDM works by creating controlled electrical sparks between an electrode and the workpiece.
Power: Determines cutting depth
Speed: Affects cut quality
Focus: Influences precision
Pressure: Typically 60,000 PSI or higher
Abrasive flow rate: Affects cutting speed and quality
Nozzle diameter: Influences cut width and precision
Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) offers numerous benefits across industries. These advantages make it a crucial method in modern production.
SM works with an extensive variety of materials:
Metals (steel, aluminum, titanium)
Plastics (ABS, PVC, acrylic)
Composites (carbon fiber, fiberglass)
Wood
Glass
Stone
This versatility allows SM to meet diverse manufacturing needs.
SM excels in creating highly accurate parts. It achieves tight tolerances, often as small as 0.001 inches.
Technique | Typical Tolerance |
---|---|
CNC Milling | ±0.0005" |
EDM | ±0.0001" |
Laser Cutting | ±0.003" |
SM produces parts with superior surface quality. This often eliminates the need for additional finishing processes.
For high-volume production, SM outpaces additive methods:
Multi-axis CNC machines work quickly
Automated tool changing reduces downtime
Simultaneous operations on different parts
SM becomes more economical as production volume increases. Initial setup costs are offset by faster production rates.
SM easily handles large components. It's ideal for industries requiring substantial parts:
Aerospace (aircraft components)
Automotive (engine blocks)
Construction (structural elements)
While Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) offers many benefits, it also has limitations. Understanding these drawbacks is essential for effective application.
SM removes material to create parts. This process generates significant waste:
Up to 90% of material can become scrap in some cases
Recycling options may be limited for certain materials
Increased environmental impact due to waste disposal
SM struggles with intricate designs:
Internal cavities are challenging to produce
Certain shapes may require multiple setups or specialized tools
Some complex features might be impossible to machine
SM often requires extensive preparation:
Aspect | Impact |
---|---|
Tool selection | Time-consuming |
Machine programming | Requires expertise |
Fixture creation | Additional cost |
Modifying designs in SM can be costly:
Changes may require new tooling
Reprogramming machines is often necessary
Existing setups might become obsolete
SM machines demand skilled operators:
Understanding of material properties
Knowledge of cutting speeds and feed rates
Ability to interpret complex technical drawings
SM tools degrade over time:
Regular tool replacement is necessary
High-quality tools can be expensive
Worn tools can affect part quality
Aspect | Additive Manufacturing | Subtractive Manufacturing |
---|---|---|
Process | Builds objects by adding layers of material | Removes material from a larger piece to create objects |
Material Waste | Minimal waste | High material waste |
Compatible Materials | Limited (mainly plastics and some metals) | Wide range (metals, plastics, wood, glass, stone) |
Complexity | Can produce highly complex and intricate geometries | Better suited for relatively simple geometries |
Accuracy | Less accurate (tolerances as tight as 0.100 mm) | More accurate (tolerances as tight as 0.025 mm) |
Production Volume | Suitable for small batches | Ideal for large production runs |
Speed | Slower for large volumes | Faster for large volumes |
Cost | More cost-effective for small quantities | More cost-effective for large quantities |
Design Flexibility | High flexibility for design changes | Less flexible for design changes |
Surface Finish | Often requires post-processing | Can produce smooth finishes directly |
Operator Skill | Requires less skilled operators | Requires highly skilled operators |
Equipment Cost | Lower initial equipment cost | Higher initial equipment cost |
Tooling | Minimal tooling required | Extensive tooling often needed |
Sustainability | More sustainable due to less waste | Less sustainable due to material waste |
Internal Features | Can easily create internal features | Difficult to create internal features |
Size Limitations | Generally limited to smaller parts | Can produce large-scale parts |
Post-processing | Often requires multiple steps | Higher completion level after initial process |
Hybrid manufacturing combines Additive Manufacturing (AM) and Subtractive Manufacturing (SM). This approach leverages the strengths of both methods, creating a powerful synergy in production.
Hybrid processes integrate AM and SM techniques:
AM builds the base structure
SM refines and finishes the part
Benefits include:
Increased design flexibility
Improved material efficiency
Enhanced part quality
Example process flow:
3D print a near-net shape
CNC machining for precise dimensions
Polish for superior surface finish
Hybrid manufacturing excels in various areas:
Application | Benefit |
---|---|
Tooling | Complex designs with tight tolerances |
Jigs and Fixtures | Custom shapes with durable finishes |
High-tolerance Parts | Intricate geometries with precise features |
Industries utilizing hybrid processes:
Aerospace
Automotive
Medical devices
Custom manufacturing
Selecting the right manufacturing method depends on various factors. Each process offers distinct advantages, so it’s crucial to align your choice with project requirements.
The choice of material plays a significant role. Additive manufacturing (AM) typically works best with plastics and some metals, whereas subtractive manufacturing (SM) can handle a wide range of materials, including metals, plastics, wood, and glass. If you need hard-to-machine materials or higher durability, SM is often the better option.
For intricate designs with complex geometries—such as internal cavities or articulating joints—AM excels, allowing for high customization. SM, while precise, may struggle with extremely complex designs. It's better suited for simpler or intermediate geometries where tight tolerances are necessary.
AM is ideal for low to medium production volumes, such as rapid prototyping or small-batch production. For large-scale production, SM is far more efficient, especially when producing thousands of identical parts. As production volume increases, the cost-effectiveness of SM becomes clear.
Projects requiring a short lead time benefit from AM due to minimal setup and fast transition from design to product. For larger production runs, however, SM can offer quicker manufacturing times once the setup is complete, especially for metal parts.
AM is more cost-effective for small, complex parts, especially when prototyping. However, SM becomes more economical for larger parts or high production volumes. Setup costs and the cost per part typically decrease as volume increases in SM.
AM generates less waste, making it a more sustainable option. SM, while faster for large runs, produces significant material waste in the form of chips or scraps. If sustainability is a key priority, AM might be the better fit.
The following decision matrix provides a quick comparison of factors to help you choose the right method:
Factor | Additive Manufacturing (AM) | Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) |
---|---|---|
Material Range | Limited (mostly plastics, some metals) | Wide (metals, plastics, wood, glass) |
Part Complexity | Handles complex, intricate designs | Best for simpler, precise geometries |
Production Volume | Ideal for small-batch, prototyping | Efficient for mass production |
Lead Time | Faster setup, quick turnaround | Slower setup, faster for large runs |
Cost | More expensive for large parts or metals | More cost-effective at higher volumes |
Sustainability | Less waste, more sustainable | Significant waste, less sustainable |
Use this matrix to align your project’s needs with the strengths of each manufacturing method.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) and Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) play crucial roles across various industries. Their applications continue to expand and evolve.
AM: Lightweight components, complex geometries
SM: High-precision engine parts, structural elements
AM: Rapid prototyping, custom parts
SM: Engine blocks, transmission components
AM: Custom implants, prosthetics
SM: Surgical instruments, dental crowns
AM: Personalized products, small-batch items
SM: Smartphone casings, laptop components
AM: Custom jigs and fixtures
SM: Heavy machinery parts, precision tools
AM: Scale models, decorative elements
SM: Structural components, facade elements
Additive and subtractive manufacturing each have unique strengths and weaknesses. AM excels in complex designs and customization. SM offers precision and material versatility.
Understanding these differences is crucial for making informed manufacturing decisions. Consider your project's specific needs when choosing a method.
Evaluate factors like material, complexity, volume, and cost. This will help you select the best approach for your manufacturing goals.
TEAM MFG is a rapid manufacturing company who specializes in ODM and OEM starts in 2015.